[Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation (CompareInfo) support
rafim at mainsoft.com
Mon Aug 8 10:03:38 EDT 2005
Ok, I understand.
I should have written managed "ICU" ;)
I understand that this is a new mono implementation of collation for
So, mono will abandon icu4c, somewhere in the nearest future?
From: Atsushi Eno [mailto:atsushi at ximian.com]
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:45 PM
To: Rafael Mizrahi
Cc: Ilya Kharmatsky; mono-devel mailing list
Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED: managedcollation
No, no, I mean, old icu4c stuff ;-)
Rafael Mizrahi wrote:
> WOW, managed ICU,
> Does this mean that, soon, mono will stop using the native ICU
> implementation ?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com
> [mailto:mono-devel-list-bounces at lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Atsushi
> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 12:05 PM
> To: Ilya Kharmatsky
> Cc: mono-list mailing list; mono-devel mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Mono-devel-list] RE: [Mono-list] LANDED:
> (CompareInfo) support
> Hi Ilya,
>>Great news! Thank you!
> Thank you too, for all your help on it :-)
>>Are you planning to make some performance banchmarks and compare
>>"old" and may be MS.Net performance results?
> Am not planning to measure comparison results between MS.NET and Mono,
> but the attached example will show you the fact (to run it you will
> have to create "sample.txt" where any content should be OK). It is
> what I used to measure performance improvements on optimizing my code.
> But it is good idea to measure comparison between ICU based code and
> managed collation. I'll post a followup if I managed to get
> icu-based code working (it is disabled now and am not sure if the
> latest code works fine).
> Atsushi Eno
More information about the Mono-devel-list