[Mono-devel-list] NUnit Regression test suites.
cpoole at pooleconsulting.com
Wed Jan 19 18:54:34 EST 2005
To be clear, I should point out that the extensibility features are
still not in a full release
of NUnit, but only in the "Iteration Releases" on SourceForge. That's
our signal that
the details might change in the future - and in fact they have and will
continue to do it.
If there's sufficient benefit, that might not be an obstacle to using
one of these releases
for Mono development.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick D [mailto:ndrochak at gol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:07 AM
> To: 'Charlie Poole'; 'Gert Driesen'; 'Rafael Teixeira'; 'Mono
> devel list'; sebastien at ximian.com; 'Gonzalo Paniagua Javier'
> Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] NUnit Regression test suites.
> >| -----Original Message-----
> >| From: Charlie Poole [mailto:cpoole at pooleconsulting.com]
> >| Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 4:53 PM
> >| To: 'Gert Driesen'; 'Rafael Teixeira'; 'Mono devel list'
> >| Cc: 'Nick Drochak'
> >| Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] NUnit Regression test suites.
> >| Hi Guys,
> >| I was under the impression we no longer had a mono fork of
> NUnit. We
> >| worked to do what was needed so that NUnit 2.2 could go
> into mono as
> >| is... althoguh I'm not sure whether it actually made it into a
> >| release - it might be nunit 2.1.93 still.
> There isn't a fork at all, I don't think. I think just the
> sources are in svn. Not sure which version of sources,
> although Sebastien or Gonzalo might know. I think one of
> them did the most recent import.
> >| The particular feature sounds like it might be pretty specific to
> >| mono, but there might be some way to do it using the new
> >| extensibility features of NUnit that came out in the 2.2.1 release?
> I quickly reviewed the extensibility feature a few days ago
> and didn't have time to delve into it yet. Let me have a
> look at that later and see if it allows for a better solution.
> >| I think there's tremendous advantage to users to have a single
> >| version of nunit and to build any special features on top of it,
> >| instead of forking.... even if that's easier in the short term.
> Absolutely. Right now we do not need to change nunit at all
> for what we are going to do. We are only using the wonderful
> [Category] feature as per Miguel's suggestion. Perhaps
> Rafael and I can come up with a better plan after we have
> time to study the new nunit version to help with automagic
> bug watching.
> Nick D.
More information about the Mono-devel-list