[Mono-devel-list] Re: W3C xmlconf test status
ilyak at mainsoft.com
Thu Jun 2 06:11:06 EDT 2005
>> Just to make sure: "GH" is "GrassHopper", right?
Atsushi Eno wrote:
> Hi again,
> I think there are some patches that are rejected because they
> resulted in regressions. That's why such inconsistency has
> happened. I cannot call them "regressions".
> (Just to make sure: "GH" is "GrassHopper", right? Maybe many of
> the readers don't understand what it is.)
> Atsushi Eno
> Andrew Skiba wrote:
>> Hi again.
>> I think my mission with W3C testsuite is done. Few thinks that can be
>> improved I listed in TODO file, but the suite can be used already.
>> I ran this suite against the last GH System.Xml and Mono, and there
>> were 10 fixes and 62 regressions. I devided all tests that fail on
>> mono into 2 groups - those that fail on also on GH I put to
>> knownFailures.lst, and those specific to mono are listed in
>> fixme.lst. We need to understand those regressions before we can use
>> SVN instead of our current code.
>> Next thing, I will make XSLT testsuite to provide the similar
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
More information about the Mono-devel-list