Spam: Re: [Mono-devel-list] minor xslttest makefile patch
andrews at mainsoft.com
Tue Jun 7 07:13:02 EDT 2005
Atsushi Eno wrote:
> Are they really such testcases? I think those tests listed up
> there are bug in your sed script. The previous catalog.xml which
> I manually edited was pointing to the correct file names. Just
> compare old catalog.xml and your catalog-fixed.xml.
Can you tell me exactly what did you fix by hand? As for the first
question, here is the list of tests that throw exception on dotnet and
were marked as regressions in the first list.
And there are few testcases that are not catched by the current
testsuite, probably should check them manually (may be they really pass?)
> If the patched version works fine, then let's just check it in w/
> TARGET_JVM with comments.
Let's decide about that later, OK?
> Besides the specification I tend to agree your idea to fix it.
> Am not sure what you mean "pre-defined english words",
Currently we have only 2:
and may be we should have few others, like
that's what I can easily find, surely there are others.
>> We have also some Xalan tests regressed, if you are interested to
> Let's put it on our table :-)
More information about the Mono-devel-list