[Mono-devel-list] Re: Analysis of W3C regressions
andrews at mainsoft.com
Tue Jun 14 02:37:14 EDT 2005
Atsushi Eno wrote:
> I need concrete number unlike just saying "there are regressions".
I did not just say "there are regressions". I spent few hours on
debugging, digging svn and creating patch that can be applied to svn
latest, to find what exactly led to these regressions.
And concrete number is 62 regressions out of them I know the origin of
21, this is revision 41840.
> For now what I got from r41840 is
The regressions were introduced by r41840, so you should get r41839 to
see the difference ;-)
I attached patch which undoes the r41840, did you try to apply the patch
to svn latest and run w3c tests? You can see that it's really a part of
41840 by issuing
svn diff -r41839:41840>41840.diff
then compare 41840.diff to the patch I have sent.
More information about the Mono-devel-list