[Mono-devel-list] [Patch] Another patch forRuntime.InteropServicesin corlib
spouliot at videotron.ca
Tue May 24 13:44:48 EDT 2005
> although they are no serious "issues", I'd still call them this
> way, because
> not having this interfaces and attributes might very well break code
> (although it's not very likely)
Let's call that a "very unlikely interoperability issue" ;-)
> > See: http://www.mono-project.com/Coding_Guidelines#Examples
> I read the Coding Guidelines Textfile in svn quite some times and
> there is no rule as to how to format a namespace.
Not in the text, but the example (see the URL) is formatted this way.
> Maybe we should add it there.
> Actually in this case i didn't reformat the lines, but instead
> replaced the entire headers, so at least these interface files
> are consistent.
The main point (which wasn't specific to your patch) was not to change
the sources unless it's required (reviewing smaller patches is faster).
home: spouliot at videotron.ca
More information about the Mono-devel-list