Matthijs ter Woord
matthijsterwoord at gmail.com
Fri Oct 7 04:49:04 EDT 2005
I think for this, we should add some attributes to the member elements in
the docs, something like InNET1_0 for members in Fx 1.0, InNET1_1, for
members in Fx 1.1, etc. Would this be an options? Miguel?
When it would be, we would need to scan the complete documentation, and add
those attributes. Maybe we should make a one time conversion process which
imports Fx 1.0, Fx 1.1, Fx 2.0 (i don't know if that's smart yet), etc
Please give your thoughts about this.
On 10/3/05, Alexandre Miguel Pedro Gomes <alexmipego at gmail.com> wrote:
> Monodoc would need a "profile chooser" or something like that to switch
> between 1.x and 2.0 profile, right? Any plans on those things?
> Btw anyone knows why the C# specification appears without newlines?
> On 9/30/05, Miguel de Icaza <miguel at ximian.com > wrote:
> > Hello,
> > > When will monodoc be ready for .NET 2.0 classes? (ie, when will it
> > > also allow to document generics)
> > We will have to wait for someone to contribute the necessary code to
> > cope with this. I have not had much time to look into this issue.
> > What needs to be done is:
> > * Look at the new ECMA XML documentation from ECMA and evaluate
> > how we could bring those changes into our documentation.
> > * Someone would have to port the new docs nonetheless.
> > * Someone would have to architect the changes to the monodoc
> > engine to do so.
> > The right place to discuss this is the mono-docs-list.
> > That being said, if you can not wait to write some documentation, we
> > have a *lot* of stuff in the 1.x profile that needs documentation.
> > Considering that 2.x stuff wont be 100% supported for a while, maybe it
> > would be best to contribute to the 1.x effort.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mono-devel-list mailing list
> > Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
> Alexandre Gomes, Portugal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mono-devel-list