[Mono-dev] Mono Continuations and MicroThreads
d_erchoff at hotmail.com
Fri Apr 21 03:12:35 EDT 2006
As i remember, previous version of your scheduler class has a "strong
reference" to the socket manager class.
What about an application does not using sockets ?
What about another socket implementation ( my case ) ?
This is not a crucial fix, but i think it is better to keep out the
Socket management. A programmer will use a microthread to update his
Tomi Valkeinen a écrit :
> I made some more optimizations and I finally beat stackless python in
> the yield test. Almost 3.5M yields/s if ran with inline-optimizations,
> when the old result was 1.6M. http://bat.org/~tomba/monoco.html has
> updated source and benchmarks.
> What comes to getting continuations to official mono, I think the
> implementation is quite far from being ready for that. There are
> million things to do before the implementation is usable for everyone,
> and most importantly, the continuations will need a lot of testing
> before I trust that they actually work...
> But I do hope that some people will try them out, perhaps even
> improving something. Test programs would be especially nice, and
> benchmarks both in C# and stackless python.
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
More information about the Mono-devel-list