[Mono-dev] mod_mono, fast_cgi and configuration.
Miguel de Icaza
miguel at novell.com
Tue May 8 01:37:55 EDT 2007
> I doubt FastCGI would be easier to configure.
> Configuring an application-to-mono-process mapping, easily
> to achieve with mod_mono, will become a nightmare with FastCGI.
> Moreover, the config snippets above must be inserted in
> every vhost, otherwise the vhosts will share the same
> mono-fastcgi-server process.
Thanks for this feedback, I was not aware that the configuration would
become more complicated.
Do you have some ideas on what we could do to make mod_mono simpler to
And do people have some thoughts on what we could do to improve
mod_mono? Which areas are particularly weak, and what can we do to
> And since HttpResponse.TransmitFile won't be as efficient as it
> used to be under mod_mono (which simply passes the file name
> to apache), even more apache config voodoo is required (and that's
> the best case).
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
More information about the Mono-devel-list