[Mono-dev] moonlight source in mono-2.0
fejj at novell.com
Mon Aug 18 19:54:43 EDT 2008
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 23:37 +0100, Paul wrote:
> > > For that reason, anything to do with moonlight has to be removed from
> > > the sourceball, therefore the code to build smcs has to go.
> > but the source to smcs is exactly the same as that of gmcs!?!?
> > As Yoda might say: "No sense does this logic make."
> In that case, what does smcs really do that gmcs doesn't other than
> target the moonlight bits and pieces?
Nothing. That's the entire difference.
The difference between the 2.0 and the 2.1 assemblies is that the 2.1
assemblies are only a small subset of the 2.0 assemblies (wouldn't want
Silverlight apps accessing the filesystem, or accessing many of the
other System classes due to security concerns, so the 2.1 assemblies
simply strip all of that out).
> Fedora are really picky over
> things, so I play it safe.
> Now, onto more pressing matters. How the hell do I get XIM to play
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
More information about the Mono-devel-list