Fri Feb 8 08:55:55 EST 2008
developer, I agree that mono 1.0 should correspond to .net 1.0, 1.1 to =
1.1, etc for compatibility (and marketing) reasons.
Will a .90 Release just not cut it? And for that matter 1.09, etc?=20
Just a suggestion of course...
From: ndrochak at gol.com [mailto:ndrochak at gol.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 3:40 AM
To: Rob.Tillie at Student.tUL.EDU; mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Version moniker for Mono Release
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Rob.Tillie at Student.tUL.EDU [mailto:Rob.Tillie at Student.tUL.EDU]
| Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 4:40 PM
| To: nick at ingeniumgroup.com; mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
| Subject: RE: [Mono-devel-list] Version moniker for Mono Release
| Well, you've got a point, without a doubt.
| But Miguel also has a point in that Mono should be releasing a stable
| release very soon now... I believe Mono has a lot of momentum right =
| waiting too long, that momentum could decrease, having the same =
| losing a large user base...
I agree completely. I didn't mean to imply delaying the release, only =
choose the name carefully.
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
More information about the Mono-devel-list