[Mono-dev] DynamicModuleHelper and HttpApplication RegisterModule methods
monoforum at my2cents.co.uk
Thu Apr 24 13:51:52 UTC 2014
I've just found that Matthid on Github has done a far better implementation
in pull 888 so I won't bother...
Who needs to look at it before it's merged?
On 23 April 2014 19:56, Martin Thwaites <monoforum at my2cents.co.uk> wrote:
> First, I'm not asking for something to be implemented, I'm asking for help
> implementing it as I think there will be more and I'm endeavoring to
> implement them all if possible.
> I'm having a play with trying to get the MVC5 boilerplate working on mono
> and one of the libraries (Microsoft.Owin) uses the new
> HttpApplication.RegisterModule method, which is not yet present in the
> current master branch.
> Looking at the descriptions on MSDN, there is very little information on
> what it's supposed to do, but it looks like it just does the same as the
> method DynamicModuleHelper.RegisterModule... in that it just registers a
> module at runtime, in memory.
> So, in light of the above, I have a few questions.
> 1. Would a pull be accepted if it just copies the implementation from the
> Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure class in the current mono codebase? Given
> that the new method is in the HttpApplication class, I would say that it's
> a valid assumption that it's only Web modules that can be added.
> 2. If I'm just copying the implementation into System.Web, would it be
> advisable to edit the Microsoft.Web.Infrastructure class to just forward
> through to System.Web?
> 3. What, if any, tests should be created (I'm used to working in an
> environment with interfaces that could be mocked with Moq). I could do
> with some information on how to do this, in terms of possibly some examples
> that are considered good, and locations in the current codebase.
> 4. Given that this is only available in .NET 4.5, is there some way I
> should stop it from being accessible on .NET 4.0 (if so, how)? I'm not sure
> there is an issue with leaving it available on .NET 4.0 other than the mono
> version has more methods than .NET...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Mono-devel-list