[Mono-list] Creating a standalone Mono executable?
rmboggs at gmail.com
Fri Jan 4 15:26:29 UTC 2013
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Daniel Lo Nigro <lists at dan.cx> wrote:
> Github does offer binary downloads, but I think you need to enable it for
> the repository. They're not as strict as Sourceforge (they'd let you host
> binaries even if you don't host all the source code). However Sourceforge
> has more mirrors and I've found their download servers to be much quicker.
Actually, I believe github is turning off this feature for some
reason. So if you go that route, you'll need to find another location
to post binary downloads.
More details can be found here:
> It's up to you. I think Sourceforge supports Git and Mercurial now so you
> can get use either one for Git.
> Sent from my phone - please excuse any typos.
> On 04/01/2013 7:09 AM, "hallambaker" <hallam at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks, that looks like it is exactly what I need.
>> Just have to work out how to get the packaging technology to run and
>> create separate binaries for Mac and Linux when running the build from a
>> Windows machine now.
>> Oh and work out where to host it all. I had started on Sourceforge, then
>> people told me github was the place to be. But github does not seem to offer
>> binary downloads. So maybe I should go back to sourceforge.
>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:09 AM, thenextman [via Mono] <[hidden email]>
>>> I think you are looking for mkbundle: http://linux.die.net/man/1/mkbundle
>>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
>>> To unsubscribe from Creating a standalone Mono executable?, click here.
>> Website: http://hallambaker.com/
>> View this message in context: Re: Creating a standalone Mono executable?
>> Sent from the Mono - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
> Mono-list maillist - Mono-list at lists.ximian.com
More information about the Mono-list