cjac at colliertech.org
Thu Aug 6 15:04:37 EDT 2009
I don't know if I agree with that....
"Open Sources" seems to be the first place that Tim, Eric and Chris
really started pushing the "Open Source" brand. Here is one of the
essays from the book:
The FSF is also pretty clear on the matter:
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 13:36 -0400, Abe Gillespie wrote:
> This is off topic, but ... I have personal experience regarding this
> matter with my zigGIS project. I got quite flamed for using the
> moniker "Open Source". It's generally accepted that the term "Open
> Source" does in fact mean both the source is available and the
> software is free. "Source Opened" is the generally accepted moniker
> for software that's for pay with the source available; the case of
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:29 PM, C.J. Adams-Collier<cjac at colliertech.org> wrote:
> > Keep in mind that one can charge money for open source apps. "Open
> > Source" and "for profit" are not mutually exclusive.
> > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 13:20 -0400, Abe Gillespie wrote:
> >> When figuring out the licensing details for MonoTouch, please include
> >> apps that are free and apps that will be open source.
> >> -Abe
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> MonoTouch mailing list
> >> MonoTouch at lists.ximian.com
> >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monotouch
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/private/monotouch/attachments/20090806/7d1d181e/attachment-0008.bin
More information about the MonoTouch