[MonoTouch] Protocol Buffers + MonoTouch = And Interesting Approach To Improving Application Performance
chris at foundation42.org
Tue Aug 11 19:49:35 EDT 2009
This sounds great. I know I'd like to use it for our projects. In fact, we
are just deciding on our network client/server protocol at the moment.
Would be good to see if we can use protobuf.
What things if any would prevent the library working as-is on MonoTouch?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:39 PM, M. David Peterson
<m.david at 3rdandurban.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:33 PM, M. David Peterson <
> m.david at 3rdandurban.com> wrote:
>> Based on some work I did in the early days of the protobuf-net project
>> with getting things to work with both Silverlight and Mono,
> BTW... The three projects inside of the protobuf-net repository that I
> developed that highlight the ability to use protobuf-net within your
> Silverlight applications are found @[1,2,3] < I'm not sure if Marc has made
> any changes to these since my last check-in nearly a year ago, but I'll
> verify to be certain and update this thread accordingly.
>  http://protobuf-net.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/SilverlightExtended/
>  http://protobuf-net.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/SilverlightExtended_Web/
> M. David Peterson
> Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC
> Email: m.david at 3rdandUrban.com | m.david at amp.fm
> Mobile: (206) 999-0588
> http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm |
> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 |
> MonoTouch mailing list
> MonoTouch at lists.ximian.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the MonoTouch