[Gtk-sharp-list] Re: [Mono-docs-list] Gtk# documentation: missing classes.

John Luke jluke@cfl.rr.com
26 Jul 2003 00:35:35 -0400

> Extra points: the MIT X11 or the BSD license are best in this case, just
> to stay clear of the current FDL debate ;-)

So what license are the docs under now, according to
http://go-mono.com/documentation.html it is under the GFDL.  I agree
that we should use either MIT/X11/BSD license, can we do that now or is
it one of those situations where we have to ask everyone who has
contributed, etc.

Also, it would be a good idea to put a small blurb next to "This
documentation is part of the Mono Project. " stating the license, which
I can do if you want after we decide on the license. I think it is
needed because I could not find this information in the Gnome/Gtk docs
(which also might affect the license we are allowed to use).