[Gtk-sharp-list] Re: [Mono-docs-list] Gtk# documentation: missing classes.
Miguel de Icaza
26 Jul 2003 01:22:34 -0400
> > Extra points: the MIT X11 or the BSD license are best in this case, just
> > to stay clear of the current FDL debate ;-)
> So what license are the docs under now, according to
> http://go-mono.com/documentation.html it is under the GFDL. I agree
> that we should use either MIT/X11/BSD license, can we do that now or is
> it one of those situations where we have to ask everyone who has
> contributed, etc.
We should discuss this with every contributor.
At least from now on, we should ask people to contribute under the
BSD/X11 license. I have not given a lot of thought about the difference
between X11 and BSD in this context, but it would be nice to use the
BSD, to give authors proper credit.
> Also, it would be a good idea to put a small blurb next to "This
> documentation is part of the Mono Project. " stating the license, which
> I can do if you want after we decide on the license. I think it is
> needed because I could not find this information in the Gnome/Gtk docs
> (which also might affect the license we are allowed to use).