[Gtk-sharp-list] Re: [Mono-docs-list] Gtk# documentation: missing classes.
26 Jul 2003 01:50:09 -0400
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 01:22, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> > So what license are the docs under now, according to
> > http://go-mono.com/documentation.html it is under the GFDL. I agree
> > that we should use either MIT/X11/BSD license, can we do that now or is
> > it one of those situations where we have to ask everyone who has
> > contributed, etc.
> We should discuss this with every contributor.
> At least from now on, we should ask people to contribute under the
> BSD/X11 license. I have not given a lot of thought about the difference
> between X11 and BSD in this context, but it would be nice to use the
> BSD, to give authors proper credit.
How do we specify what license we are putting it under? Also, how are we
going to keep track of what license everything is under?
Honestly, I think most of us would like to spend as little time on
licensing as possible and use the time to write docs, so hope we can
keep this simple. On the other hand, it is better to do this now, as the
size of the task will only grow.