[Gtk-sharp-list] SVN trunk branch
danw at novell.com
Mon May 16 08:32:47 EDT 2005
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 11:54 +0200, Jeroen Zwartepoorte wrote:
> "Note, 1.9.x and 2.5.x are not parallel installable and there are no
> plans to make them so.": Does this mean that you plan to drop/not
> make a final release of the 1.9 version and move to 2.5?
> Why not release 2.0 now and move HEAD to 2.5? In other words: what
> issues remain until 2.0 can be released?
There is no plan to ever release 2.0, because if we did, we'd have to
keep it API stable, and so it would have to diverge from 2.5.
> What's the status (in your view) of the gnome-vfs bindings? The one
> serious bug i saw in bugzilla is from Jorn and we both can't reproduce
> his problem (waiting on info from him until i can debug it further).
I am not Mike, but some issues I'm aware of are:
* gnome-vfs-api.raw is currently "wrong"; if you run "make api" in
sources/, it makes copious changes to gnome-vfs-api.raw. I don't
know what happened to get it out of sync. (ie, if someone
mistakenly removed stuff from gnome-vfs-api.raw rather than
marking it hidden with metadata, or if new stuff has been made
visible as a result of bugfixes to the parser, or what).
* mcs and gapi-codegen give lots of warnings in gnome-vfs, some of
which probably indicate real bugs.
* I'm not sure how much use it's getting. (Maybe it's getting a
lot and so this isn't a problem.) It would be good to get a
handful of apps using it to make sure there is no lurking API
ickiness that will be painful to deal with after we've committed
to API stability. (Some of the bugs in bugzilla may tie into
this, eg, the MimeAction problem.)
More information about the Gtk-sharp-list