lists at ophion.org
Mon Oct 3 14:59:53 EDT 2005
you should take a look at this:
and if you still have questions please post on to the monodoc mailing
list only. No need to cross post.
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 17:38 +0200, Matthijs ter Woord wrote:
> Is there any special format needed? (IE, ecma xml docs etc) If so, could
> anyone point me to it?
> Matthijs ter Woord
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Miguel de Icaza" <miguel at ximian.com>
> To: "Matthijs ter Woord" <matthijsterwoord at gmail.com>;
> <mono-docs-list at lists.ximian.com>
> Cc: <mono-devel-list at ximian.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 4:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Monodoc
> > Hello,
> > > When will monodoc be ready for .NET 2.0 classes? (ie, when will it
> > > also allow to document generics)
> > We will have to wait for someone to contribute the necessary code to
> > cope with this. I have not had much time to look into this issue.
> > What needs to be done is:
> > * Look at the new ECMA XML documentation from ECMA and evaluate
> > how we could bring those changes into our documentation.
> > * Someone would have to port the new docs nonetheless.
> > * Someone would have to architect the changes to the monodoc
> > engine to do so.
> > The right place to discuss this is the mono-docs-list.
> > That being said, if you can not wait to write some documentation, we
> > have a *lot* of stuff in the 1.x profile that needs documentation.
> > Considering that 2.x stuff wont be 100% supported for a while, maybe it
> > would be best to contribute to the 1.x effort.
> Mono-devel-list mailing list
> Mono-devel-list at lists.ximian.com
More information about the Mono-devel-list